Thanks. I'll do that later, I'm still at work right now.

I will also remove some initialization on buffer creation so that will
speed things up even more.

On 7/27/21 4:18 PM, DBJ wrote:
> Phill, please add your allocator here https://godbolt.org/z/drEnYera1
> <https://godbolt.org/z/drEnYera1> and report back, if that is OK to
> ask of you.
>
> Please note the benchmarking infrastructure in use and allocator
> interface so that it can be used as a template argument to
> std::vector. I might dare to call that code: "realistic benchmarking".
>
> Kind regards...
>
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 20:44, Phil Bouchard <boost_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:boost_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> Yeah I updated it again (disabled page_t initialization) so in
> general it's more like 3x faster. Which is good if you require
> low-latency (finance, gaming industry, ...). That's why we all use
> C++ after all, no?
>
>
> --
>
> *Phil Bouchard*
> Founder & CTO
> C.: (819) 328-4743
>
> Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
>
>
> On 7/24/21 12:18 PM, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:
>>
>> Interestingly, if I increase the LOOP_SIZE the overall time taken
>> is less thus is faster. Also please keep DATASET_SIZE to 1
>> because I didn't test it with other sizes.
>>
>> I'll follow later this weekend, meanwhile I've put the code here:
>>
>> https://github.com/philippeb8/Flash-Alloc
>> <https://github.com/philippeb8/Flash-Alloc>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Phil Bouchard*
>> Founder & CTO
>> C.: (819) 328-4743
>>
>> Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
>>
>>
>> On 7/24/21 6:19 AM, DBJ wrote:
>>> https://godbolt.org/z/T4qc5o8Mb <https://godbolt.org/z/T4qc5o8Mb>
>>>
>>> that turns out to be many times slower vs. std::allocator<> ...
>>>
>>> I must be doing something wrong?
>>>
>>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 09:40, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals
>>> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]
>>> <mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> And here's a more generic one that is 10x faster for
>>> straight allocations.
>>>
>>> Anyway my point being that apparently the rebind oddity has
>>> been removed from the C++20 standards but not from my system
>>> headers... So perhaps adding a similar ultra fast allocator
>>> such as this one into the stdlib would be constructive.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Phil Bouchard*
>>> Founder & CTO
>>> C.: (819) 328-4743
>>>
>>> Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/23/21 10:23 PM, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>>
>>>> Given the default memory allocator is known to be slow, it
>>>> came to my attention that if we collect more information at
>>>> compile-time regarding not only the type being allocated
>>>> but the container type and the usage frequency then we can
>>>> have much higher performance.
>>>>
>>>> In the attached example, if we use a queue then we can
>>>> speed up the overall allocation time by 7x!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> *Phil Bouchard*
>>>> Founder & CTO
>>>> C.: (819) 328-4743
>>>>
>>>> Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>>> <mailto:Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]>
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>> <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals>
>>>
>>

-- 
*Phil Bouchard*
Founder & CTO
C.: (819) 328-4743
Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>