Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:44:35 +0100
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, 21:32 Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Monday, 26 July 2021 12:54:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
> > ... or to create some "process singleton" already emitting these
> converted
> > signals. On 7/26/21 3:51 PM, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > One thing that could be done though is to provide a static conversion
> > function called explicitly that will convert these POSIX signals into the
> > new safer signal types. Just an idea...
>
> That is what I call "new use-cases".
>
> No, thanks. Whoever needs to deal with POSIX / Unix signals already has
> the
> code. I don't really care to make their lives easier.
>
Hopefully everyone is aware of asio signal_set?
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_76_0/doc/html/boost_asio/overview/signals.html
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Monday, 26 July 2021 12:54:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
> > ... or to create some "process singleton" already emitting these
> converted
> > signals. On 7/26/21 3:51 PM, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > One thing that could be done though is to provide a static conversion
> > function called explicitly that will convert these POSIX signals into the
> > new safer signal types. Just an idea...
>
> That is what I call "new use-cases".
>
> No, thanks. Whoever needs to deal with POSIX / Unix signals already has
> the
> code. I don't really care to make their lives easier.
>
Hopefully everyone is aware of asio signal_set?
https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_76_0/doc/html/boost_asio/overview/signals.html
Received on 2021-07-26 15:44:49