Subject: Re: [std-proposals] P0323 std::expected - void value type?
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-10-05 11:00:35
On 2020-10-05 17:41, Emile Cormier via Std-Proposals wrote:
> If C/C++ had been designed with void being an empty monostate value
> type, I guess we wouldn't have all this trouble of treating void as a
> special case in generic programming. Libraries wouldn't have needed to
> invent their own "nothing" types like nullopt_t or monostate_t.
There has been some work in that direction, but I do not know the
STD-PROPOSALS list run by email@example.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups