C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Finding the index of an element (std::find_first_index)
From: Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ) (dbj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-10-03 04:17:42

Barry, I agree with you, but I am not surprised to Mr Yosher reaction,
provoked by exactly what Mr Yosher has well described in his provoked state
:) Truth to be told I do not see a lot of technical merit in Mr Keeson's
long reply.

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p2000r0.pdf) is the
only not-purely-technical ISO C++, paper I do follow.

Kind regards,


On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 20:03, Barry Revzin via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:39 PM Kosher Yosher via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> 1 function call being more concise than 2 is not an opinion, it's a fact.
>> I honestly can't believe I have to explain this over multiple emails. I
>> hope we can agree that calling water "water" is better than
>> "hydrogen + oxygen". Apply the exact same logic to programming languages
>> please.
> There is no need to be condescending. Please treat people with respect -
> they are taking time of their day to provide you good feedback.
> Thanks,
> Barry
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups