C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Feedback on implementing proposed std::error type

From: Gašper Ažman <gasper.azman_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:09:35 +0100
Look at mpark/wg21 on GitHub.

It's not the only way to format documents, but it helps. A paper has a
particular structure you should follow, but since yours is not a proposal,
you can skip the proposed wording.

Once your paper is "in shape" I'll upload it to the tracker. I'll get you a
paper number later today.


On Tue, May 12, 2020, 15:35 Charles Salvia <charles.a.salvia_at_[hidden]>

> Yes, thank you, that would be great. What is the process for publishing
> in a mailing?
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:41 AM Gašper Ažman <gasper.azman_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>> Do you need help publishing this in a mailing?
>> On Tue, May 12, 2020, 06:00 Charles Salvia via Std-Proposals <
>> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> I've implemented std::error, meeting the requirements laid out in [P1028
>>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p1028r3.pdf>],
>>> and based on this experience, have written up a paper outlining various
>>> design decisions and concerns that came up during the implementation,
>>> particularly with regard to how std::error might map to existing error
>>> mechanisms (dynamic exceptions, std::error_code).
>>> This is not a formal proposal right now. It is intended simply to
>>> further discussion around the design, requirements and implementation
>>> details of some future std::error specification.
>>> https://charles-salvia.github.io/std_error_feedback.html
>>> --
>>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

Received on 2020-05-13 03:14:40