C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: std::span

From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 20:07:07 +0300
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 20:05, Tony V E <tvaneerd_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> If someone wrote a paper for span::at, and explained away all the "excuses" for not having it (ie header dependencies, etc), I might vote for it.
> Consistency is a strong argument for any API decision.
> Or maybe it was discussed and voted already and best not to rehash?

An uphill battle. Sun Tzu told me not to do that. We have better
things to do. Just wrap it and move on.

Received on 2020-04-19 12:10:15