Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:04:13 +0300
JeanHeyd Meneide via Std-Proposals:
> That being said, maybe an at() free function should be proposed and dumped
> into some safety header for standard C++.
I guess it should be `std::ranges::at` taking `std::ranges::random_access_range`.
> That being said, maybe an at() free function should be proposed and dumped
> into some safety header for standard C++.
I guess it should be `std::ranges::at` taking `std::ranges::random_access_range`.
Received on 2020-04-15 00:07:20