Yes, I am fully aware of std::array but it does not fix the C-style arrays,
it just provides another solution for stack-based const size arrays (and
one that does not always work as expected due to brace-elision preventing
correct deduction of constructors being called for each element).

I am proposing to fix C-style arrays. I don't want yet another const size
array container (and especially the one that slows compilation time due to
template bloat).


czw., 12 mar 2020 o 23:06 Ryan Nicholl via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> napisał(a):

> We have std::array for this purpose, so that compatibility with C is not
> broken.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> On Mar 12, 2020, 17:40, Maciej Cencora via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose to deprecate in C++23:
> 1) mixed pointer and array comparisons:
> int a[2]; int b[2];
> a == &b[0];
>
> 2) array decl in func parameters:
> void foo(int a[2]);
>
> In order to make C-style arrays behave like other aggregate types in C++26
> or later (supported assignments, comparisons, passing and returning from
> functions)
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
>