Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:14:57 +0000
Vladimir,
It looks for me that there are 2 proposals in your text. One is for uniform function call syntax.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Function_Call_Syntax
...which did not make to C++11:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/55zjar/what_happened_to_universal_function_call_syntax/
And second is making tuple-like things with constructs like [a, b].
Just for your information.
BR, Daniel
Confidentiality Notice: This message (including attachments) is a private communication solely for use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) or believe you received this message in error, notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. Any other use, retention, dissemination or copying is prohibited and may be a violation of law, including the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986.
It looks for me that there are 2 proposals in your text. One is for uniform function call syntax.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Function_Call_Syntax
...which did not make to C++11:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/55zjar/what_happened_to_universal_function_call_syntax/
And second is making tuple-like things with constructs like [a, b].
Just for your information.
BR, Daniel
Confidentiality Notice: This message (including attachments) is a private communication solely for use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) or believe you received this message in error, notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. Any other use, retention, dissemination or copying is prohibited and may be a violation of law, including the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986.
Received on 2020-02-26 11:17:42