Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 20:17:13 +0100
Hi all!
Let's assume we have the following class:
// [Case 1]
class Person {
private:
string name_;
Date birthDate_;
//.... other data members.
public:
Person(string&& name, Date const& birthDate, SomeOtherType someOtherArg)
: name_(forward<string>(name), birthDate_(birthDate)
{
// use someOtherArg to further init the instance of Person.
}
};
I propose to add support for the following simplified form which is equivalent to [Case 1]:
// [Case 2]
class Person {
private:
string name_;
Date birthDate_;
//.... other data members.
public:
Person(auto&& .name_, auto const& .birthDate_, SomeOtherType someOtherArg)
{
// use someOtherArg to further init the instance of Person.
}
};
Let's assume we have the following class:
// [Case 1]
class Person {
private:
string name_;
Date birthDate_;
//.... other data members.
public:
Person(string&& name, Date const& birthDate, SomeOtherType someOtherArg)
: name_(forward<string>(name), birthDate_(birthDate)
{
// use someOtherArg to further init the instance of Person.
}
};
I propose to add support for the following simplified form which is equivalent to [Case 1]:
// [Case 2]
class Person {
private:
string name_;
Date birthDate_;
//.... other data members.
public:
Person(auto&& .name_, auto const& .birthDate_, SomeOtherType someOtherArg)
{
// use someOtherArg to further init the instance of Person.
}
};
-- Best regards, Oleksii Tarasiuk mailto:o.tarasiuk_at_[hidden]
Received on 2020-02-06 13:19:56