C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] deleting qualified named functions
From: Daniel Gutson (danielgutson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-02-05 05:29:26


El mié., 5 feb. 2020 06:02, Михаил Найденов <mihailnajdenov_at_[hidden]>
escribió:

> Note that, the extensions points are being completely revamped now.
> p1895r0.pdf
> <http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2019/p1895r0.pdf>
> p1665r0.pdf
> <http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2019/p1665r0.pdf>
>
> and others.
>

Interesting, how would you use them for this case?

> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:50 PM Daniel Gutson via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> What people think about this?
>>
>> struct S
>> {
>> *std::*swap(S&, S&) = delete;
>> };
>>
>> In this example, this would be useful to prevent std::sort for example
>> (even if we add operator< ).
>>
>> --
>> Who’s got the sweetest disposition?
>> One guess, that’s who?
>> Who’d never, ever start an argument?
>> Who never shows a bit of temperament?
>> Who's never wrong but always right?
>> Who'd never dream of starting a fight?
>> Who get stuck with all the bad luck?
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>



STD-PROPOSALS list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups