Subject: Re: [std-proposals] deleting qualified named functions
From: Daniel Gutson (danielgutson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-02-05 05:29:26
El miÃ©., 5 feb. 2020 06:02, ÐÐ¸Ñ
Ð°Ð¸Ð» ÐÐ°Ð¹Ð´ÐµÐ½Ð¾Ð² <mihailnajdenov_at_[hidden]>
> Note that, the extensions points are being completely revamped now.
> and others.
Interesting, how would you use them for this case?
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:50 PM Daniel Gutson via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> What people think about this?
>> struct S
>> *std::*swap(S&, S&) = delete;
>> In this example, this would be useful to prevent std::sort for example
>> (even if we add operator< ).
>> Whoâs got the sweetest disposition?
>> One guess, thatâs who?
>> Whoâd never, ever start an argument?
>> Who never shows a bit of temperament?
>> Who's never wrong but always right?
>> Who'd never dream of starting a fight?
>> Who get stuck with all the bad luck?
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
STD-PROPOSALS list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups