C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Should we have std::inplace_transform?
From: Michael Hava (mfh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-08 07:02:15


As long as range-algorithms are not parallelizable (which according to the latest draft they aren't), declaring iterator-based algorithms done is IMHO a bad idea...

From: Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Domen Vrankar via Std-Proposals
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 10:46 AM
To: std-proposals_at_[hidden]
Cc: Domen Vrankar <domen.vrankar_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Should we have std::inplace_transform?

Just my opinion but I'd say that any algorithm extensions suhould build on top of ranges (composibility) and that current algorithms should be left as they are.



STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups