Subject: Re: [std-proposals] function at() for span<> that throws exception on out-of-range, like vector and array ::at()
From: Eyal Rozenberg (eyalroz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-30 04:15:23
What are the arguments against "at()", other than possibly being redundant?
On 30/11/2019 05:15, Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals wrote:
> some technical experts
> ... are adamant about at() being an abomination
> "thou shalt not ever perform
> that operation" connotations that some
> subscribe to.
STD-PROPOSALS list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups