C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: function at() for span<> that throws exception on out-of-range, like vector and array ::at()

From: Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 12:15:23 +0200
What are the arguments against "at()", other than possibly being redundant?

Eyal

On 30/11/2019 05:15, Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals wrote:
> some technical experts
> ... are adamant about at() being an abomination
> "thou shalt not ever perform
> that operation" connotations that some
> subscribe to.

Received on 2019-11-30 04:18:39