C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: initializer_list vs. move semantics breaks uniform initialization

From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 22:14:26 +0200
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 22:12, Brian Bi via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> This question gets asked from time to time. As far as I know, the answer is still that http://wg21.link/P0065 remains the most popular proposal to allow move semantics to be used with initializer lists but the committee still isn't convinced this is important. See Reddit threads 1, 2.
> It's pretty strange to me, because I can think of much less important proposals that have made it into the language.

P0065 changes the meaning of some existing cases. I would venture a
guess that a proposal that doesn't do that
might fare better.

Received on 2019-11-15 14:16:57