C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] More flexible break statements.
From: Ville Voutilainen (ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-08-16 15:05:53


On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:59, Walt Karas via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> 1. 'break short;' statement would break out of the immediately enclosing compound statement. This would eliminate the need for the 'do { /* yada */ } while (0);' idiom. It would be an error if the immediately enclosing compound statement were a function body. (If the compound statement was a direct component of an iteration statement, 'break short;' would be the same as 'continue;'.)
>
> 2. 'break LABEL;' statement would break out of a directly or indirectly enclosing statement immediately preceded by the label 'LABEL:'. It would be an error if no such statement existed.

Yeah, well, these ideas pop up every now and then. A paper containing
them, http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3879.pdf,
was discussed and rejected in Rapperswil 2014.


STD-PROPOSALS list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups