I think that was a mistake from C that C++ had to inherit. Irrelevant though. The syntax is "T&&..." so you can just use that and move on.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:58 AM Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>
> Il 30/11/23 11:26, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Discussion ha scritto:
> > The syntax of Func1 makes more sense because we have to define
> > variables as follows:
> >
> > int &&a = monkey, &&b = donkey, &&c = fish;
> >
> > That is to say: The '&&' goes with the name -- not with the type.
>
> It goes with the type.
No it doesn't.
int array[64u];
int (&array2)[64u] = array;
If you want something to be a reference or a pointer, you put the
asterisk or the ampersand with the _name_.
--
Std-Discussion mailing list
Std-Discussion@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion