On 23 November 2023 18:05:56 GMT, Daniel Markus via Std-Discussion <std-discussion@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to learn about object lifetime and am reading the specification. When I was
reading §6.7.3/9 I realized that "another object of the original type does not occupy
that same storage location" is applicable also for the normal use case. I.e. a normal
destruction would also be undefined.
Would the following wording amend it?
"another object not of the original type does occupy..."
Here's the commit.
Best regards,
Daniel Markus