On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 14:22, <language.lawyer@gmail.com> wrote:

> IOW, the example is not related to https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4868/over.ics.rank#3.3, you need multiple `f`s to start to care about that bullet.

Actually, this should not be new to you, here is your 10 y.o. question https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11555950/distinguishing-between-user-defined-conversion-sequences-by-the-initial-standard

Amazing, thanks. It clearly didn't sink in 10 years ago!

Perhaps it would be helpful if https://wg21.link/over.ics.rank#note-1 were to mention that these bullets cannot be used to rank ICSs but only apply to the later provisions of https://wg21.link/over.match.best#general-2

I still wonder about "or they initialize the same class in an aggregate initialization" in [over.ics.rank]/3.3, since it seems clear that in such case the second SCS is always the identity conversion. Do you have any thoughts about this part?