Вторник, 27 июля 2021, 14:29 +03:00 от Antoine Viallon <antoine@lesviallon.fr>:
Basically, it means that expr-or-braced-init-list is… either an expression, or… a braced init list.
You can then search how is an expression defined, and how a braced init list is defined.
Everything is in the link I sent earlier.
Have a nice day,
Antoine Viallon
De : Vladimir Grigoriev <vlad.moscow@mail.ru>
Envoyé : 27 juillet 2021 12:46:36 GMT+02:00
À : Antoine Viallon <antoine@lesviallon.fr>
Cc : std-discussion@lists.isocpp.org, Brian Bi <bbi5291@gmail.com>
Objet : Re[2]: [std-discussion] What is the meaning of expr-or-braced-init-list in the grammar of the term initializer?I have not understood how this reference is related to my question.With best regards,(Vlad from Moscow)Вторник, 27 июля 2021, 12:32 +03:00 от Antoine Viallon <antoine@lesviallon.fr>:
See this:
http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.init.general#nt:expr-or-braced-init-list
Antoine Viallon
De : Vladimir Grigoriev via Std-Discussion <std-discussion@lists.isocpp.org>
Envoyé : 26 juillet 2021 22:00:50 GMT+02:00
À : Brian Bi <bbi5291@gmail.com>
Cc : Vladimir Grigoriev <vlad.moscow@mail.ru>, std-discussion@lists.isocpp.org
Objet : Re: [std-discussion] What is the meaning of expr-or-braced-init-list in the grammar of the term initializer?And what?!Понедельник, 26 июля 2021, 22:49 +03:00 от Brian Bi <bbi5291@gmail.com>:
See http://eel.is/c++draft/grammarindex for a list of references to expr-or-braced-init-listOn Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:43 PM Vladimir Grigoriev via Std-Discussion <std-discussion@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:--In the section «Initializers» of the C++ Standard in the grammar that describes the term initializer there are the following linesexpr-or-braced-init-list:expressionbraced-init-listBut nowhere in the grammar there is a reference to this term.It is unclear why is it present here and how is it related to the term initializer?With best regards(Vlad from Moscow)
Std-Discussion mailing list
Std-Discussion@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
--Brian Bi