Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:56:32 +0000
Not sure if this lands, but runtime indexed tuples can be implemented without reflection. I implemented this a few years back.
Regards,
Maxim Gurschi
On 28 Oct 2026, at 16:51, Muneem via Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
Hi! I was writing code for a future ISO cpp proposal, I can't explain what the proposal is about yet, and the idea is probably gonna need some testing before I leave it out but in the meanwhile, I hope someone could take a look at my code and critique it, like save me from making mistakes before it's too late, since I am using some new "cutting edge" features which are relatively undocumented. Here is the code:https://godbolt.org/z/EhWsfvE13 .
You can view it as it changes on my github: https://github.com/HjaldrKhilji/dynamic-typed-memory/blob/main/Dynamic_memory_and_base_interpretor_foundation.cpp .
Regards,
Maxim Gurschi
On 28 Oct 2026, at 16:51, Muneem via Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
Hi! I was writing code for a future ISO cpp proposal, I can't explain what the proposal is about yet, and the idea is probably gonna need some testing before I leave it out but in the meanwhile, I hope someone could take a look at my code and critique it, like save me from making mistakes before it's too late, since I am using some new "cutting edge" features which are relatively undocumented. Here is the code:https://godbolt.org/z/EhWsfvE13 .
You can view it as it changes on my github: https://github.com/HjaldrKhilji/dynamic-typed-memory/blob/main/Dynamic_memory_and_base_interpretor_foundation.cpp .
-- Std-Discussion mailing list Std-Discussion_at_[hidden] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
Received on 2026-10-28 18:56:45