std-discussion

Thursday, 26 March 2026

• Re: Clarification on virtual destruction order with non-static data member destructors Abhinav Agarwal
• Clarification on virtual destruction order with non-static data member destructors Anton Korzhuk

Saturday, 21 March 2026

• Re: [print.fun] Does vprint_nonunicode_buffered ignore its stream argument? Jan Schultke

Friday, 20 March 2026

• [print.fun] Does vprint_nonunicode_buffered ignore its stream argument? Abhinav Agarwal
• Re: [dcl.struct.bind] wrong index with structured binding packs Jens Maurer
• [dcl.struct.bind] wrong index with structured binding packs Abhinav Agarwal

Tuesday, 17 March 2026

• Re: Forwarding References from Variable Template Deslauriers, Douglas

Friday, 13 March 2026

• Re: Forwarding References from Variable Template Yongwei Wu
• Re: Forwarding References from Variable Template M.P.

Thursday, 12 March 2026

• Forwarding References from Variable Template Deslauriers, Douglas

Friday, 6 March 2026

• Re: Behavior of annotations on block-scope function declarations in templates Lénárd Szolnoki
• Re: Behavior of annotations on block-scope function declarations in templates Jens Maurer
• Re: Behavior of annotations on block-scope function declarations in templates Lénárd Szolnoki
• Re: Behavior of annotations on block-scope function declarations in templates Keenan Horrigan
• Re: Behavior of annotations on block-scope function declarations in templates Jens Maurer
• Re: Behavior of annotations on block-scope function declarations in templates Ell
• Behavior of annotations on block-scope function declarations in templates Keenan Horrigan

Wednesday, 4 March 2026

• Re: Template argument equivalence rules don't take user-defined types into account F. v.S.
• Should we backport const-qualified operator= to old modes as a part of P3612R1 Harmonize proxy-reference operations? F. v.S.

Tuesday, 3 March 2026

• Template argument equivalence rules don't take user-defined types into account Victor Chernyakin

Last message date: 2026-03-26 21:57:50