On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:47 PM Russell Shaw via Std-Discussion <
std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi, 14882:2024 says:
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> 7.3.1 General [conv.general]
>
> Certain language constructs require conversion to a value having one of
> a specified set of types appropriate to the construct. An expression E
> of class type C appearing in such a context is said to be contextually
> implicitly converted to a specified type T and is well-formed if and
> only if E can be implicitly converted to a type T that is determined as
> follows: C is searched for non-explicit conversion functions whose
> return type is cv T or reference to cv T such that T is allowed by the
> context. There shall be exactly one such T.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> a bit lower it says:
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Note 3 For class types, user-defined conversions are considered as well ...
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Isn't 'Note 3' redundant ? Or does it mean something else ?
>

I think note 3 is meant to apply to the entire section, not specifically to
the paragraph you quoted.


> --
> Std-Discussion mailing list
> Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
>

-- 
*Brian Bi*