C++ Logo

std-discussion

Advanced search

Re: wrong examples in standard text (also based on major compilers)

From: mauro russo <ing.russomauro_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:36:46 +0100
> I'm not sure what the current editor prefers.
> If I were you, I'd probably follow the usual
> best practice of breaking down the proposed
> changes into one PR for each change that is self-contained.

ok, I will check what can be grouped and what should be separated.
In case, a single issue for the same standard section
referring multiple PRs, one per each group.

Thanks.


Il giorno mar 26 nov 2024 alle ore 02:20 Brian Bi <bbi5291_at_[hidden]> ha
scritto:

>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 5:34 PM mauro russo <ing.russomauro_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > Editorial issues are reviewed by the editor. Core issues
>> > are reviewed by CWG. Issues that require some
>> > deliberation by core language experts have to go to CWG.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > Yes, you can submit the issue without any proposed resolution.
>>
>> Thank you, Brian.
>> What web page to submit an editorial issue ?
>>
>
> https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues
>
>
>> I might send there the point about trailing-return-type
>> without dashes, that is pending
>> on https://lists.isocpp.org/std-discussion/2024/11/2740.php
>> (please, provide your opinion on the other final questions there,
>> as I would also get a suggestion in case of multiple points
>> on the same section: is it better to put all in one, or to
>> distribute over multiple issues/PRs ?)
>>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mauro.
>>
>>>
>
> --
> *Brian Bi*
>

Received on 2024-11-26 08:36:57