> C++23 is the currently released standard (see iso.org), and
> any questions should refer to that standard or to a later working
> draft, as available in the mailings archived at
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ .

Sure, Jens, I am mostly referring to what I see on https://eel.is/c++draft/,
and I generally specify the date it refers, in any original post.
Last current update is in november.

> If, due to exceptional circumstances, you need to ask a question
> about a prior standard, please highlight that in the title of your
> question and give a rationale why we should bother about a withdrawn
> standard.

sure Jens, thank you to highlight.
I am trying to always refer the current draft.
Sometimes I referred C++20 to figure out some detail on
the history of some part text.
Sorry for any mistaken reference outside this case.


> Further, if you wish to ask a question, please ask the question,
> and don't refer to web sites on the Internet where you might
> have posted that question. I won't bother following links
> just to understand what your question is.

ok, sorry to have done in
https://lists.isocpp.org/std-discussion/2024/11/2717.php
where I reported only the main details compared to the
original question posted on another web site, and some other
in https://lists.isocpp.org/std-discussion/2024/11/2720.php

Please, suggest whether to generate a separated post,
or re-stating the point within this thread, following
https://lists.isocpp.org/std-discussion/2024/11/2720.php
and
https://lists.isocpp.org/std-discussion/2024/11/2721.php


Thank you.