>> Maybe, the follows would also work;
>> "For a type template parameter pack T, a pack-index-specifier
>> denotes a unique dependent type."

> No, it won't. It introduces "T" and then never uses it.

I see. Well, T might be removed, or even consider just:

"A pack-index-specifier denotes a unique dependent type."

That's strongly uniform with p6.


> You are ignoring the costs of responding to this e-mail,
> preparing a change, having this change reviewed in the
> appropriate forum etc.

I see, I understand that's also a cost, but gaining time for whoever future
reader
as well as future standard maintenance, hope it worth.
(no thinking for a tutorial-like way).
Maybe it might have been taken care better when it was introduced, but
that's another story.
The later, the worse, isn't it ?