Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:49:06 +0200
> On 1 Jul 2024, at 20:34, Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> It could be implemented by using swap, but it could also be implemented by not using swap, that's the thing.
Actually, this is for operator=. For a constructor the constructed object does not exist.
The moved from object should be in a valid, but unspecified state, so there seems to be nothing that guarantees it to be empty.
>
> It could be implemented by using swap, but it could also be implemented by not using swap, that's the thing.
Actually, this is for operator=. For a constructor the constructed object does not exist.
The moved from object should be in a valid, but unspecified state, so there seems to be nothing that guarantees it to be empty.
Received on 2024-07-01 18:49:24