Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:16:16 +0200
Il 16/04/24 04:50, Yongwei Wu via Std-Discussion ha scritto:
> An immediate objection I can think of myself: Changing the
> implementation may change the noexcept specification, so it is
> probably not a good idea that this can become the default. Still, it
> may be quite useful in function templates, where currently we
> sometimes use complicated noexcept conditions to determine the
> noexcept specification...
It has been proposed in the past, please search the papers. The last
development should be:
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0133r0.html
HTH,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
> An immediate objection I can think of myself: Changing the
> implementation may change the noexcept specification, so it is
> probably not a good idea that this can become the default. Still, it
> may be quite useful in function templates, where currently we
> sometimes use complicated noexcept conditions to determine the
> noexcept specification...
It has been proposed in the past, please search the papers. The last
development should be:
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0133r0.html
HTH,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
Received on 2024-04-16 07:16:21