On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:31 PM Andrey Semashev wrote
>
> Writing it the other way doesn't make sense, as you can't apply a
> reference to an expanded pack.


I see nothing nonsensical about the following:

    template<typename... Params>
    void Func(Params... &&args)
    {

    }

This syntax would make perfect sense to me given that I must define
multiple variables as follows:

    int &&i = a, *const pj = &b, &k = c;

But anyway . . . the ship sailed 12 years ago and we must write
"Params&&...", so case closed.