Am Mi., 7. Dez. 2022 um 19:22 Uhr schrieb Lénárd Szolnoki via
Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 7 December 2022 17:12:17 GMT, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Il 07/12/22 16:19, Kilian Henneberger via Std-Discussion ha scritto:
> >> But if `std::string::const_iterator` is a class type, then the first overload is a better match and will be called.
> >
> >This is https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue84 .
>
> What is "23.1.1.9 (the "do the right thing" fix)" the issue refers to?

Checking my 1998 standard, this most likely refers to paragraph 9 in
23.1.1 [lib.sequence.reqmts]:

"For every sequence defined in this clause and in clause 21:
 [...]
 — the member functions in the forms:
template <class InputIterator> // such as insert()
rt fx1(iterator p, InputIterator f, InputIterator l);
[...]
shall have the same effect, respectively, as:
fx1(p,
  static_cast<typename X::size_type>(f),
  static_cast<typename X::value_type>(l));
[...]
if InputIterator is an integral type.
 "

- Daniel