Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 18:14:58 +0000
This "not a defect" makes me sad. Fortunately none of the three most popular implementations have this issue.
On 7 December 2022 17:12:17 GMT, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Il 07/12/22 16:19, Kilian Henneberger via Std-Discussion ha scritto:
>> But if `std::string::const_iterator` is a class type, then the first overload is a better match and will be called.
>
>This is https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue84 .
>
>Thank you,
>--
>Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo_at_[hidden] | Senior Software Engineer
>KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
>Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
>KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
>
On 7 December 2022 17:12:17 GMT, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Il 07/12/22 16:19, Kilian Henneberger via Std-Discussion ha scritto:
>> But if `std::string::const_iterator` is a class type, then the first overload is a better match and will be called.
>
>This is https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue84 .
>
>Thank you,
>--
>Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo_at_[hidden] | Senior Software Engineer
>KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
>Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
>KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
>
Received on 2022-12-07 18:15:05