On 21.10.22 15:13, Edward Catmur via Std-Discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 14:00, Lénárd Szolnoki via Std-Discussion
> <std-discussion_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:std-discussion_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's explicitly not allowed in constexpr:
>
> https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4868/expr.const#5.9
> <https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4868/expr.const#5.9>
>
>
> This is annoying, esp. if P2641 is adopted;

What is P2641?

--
Wilhelm