Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 01:29:01 +0200
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 1:21 AM Thiago Macieira via Std-Discussion
<std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It actually limits to anything short of "forever", but "a century" is allowed.
It's strange that a rule would forbid something "taking forever", but
allow any arbitrarily large duration. The rule seems to lack any bite.
<std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It actually limits to anything short of "forever", but "a century" is allowed.
It's strange that a rule would forbid something "taking forever", but
allow any arbitrarily large duration. The rule seems to lack any bite.
Received on 2022-07-20 23:29:14