Subject: Re: Noexcept specification of basic_string's move assignment operator in C++11 and C++14
From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro.prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-02-21 04:38:55
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:26 AM Daniel KrÃ¼gler
> > But what is, *formally*, the situation? That C++11 and C++14 remain
> > buggy and that an implementation which applies a fix is non-conforming?
> I'm sorry, but I'm not the proper person to answer this question.
But the answer follows from your other answer below :-)
> > That is, must the operator be noexcept( true ) in C++11 and C++14?
> According to the specification of C++11 and C++14: Yes.
So, an implementation which uses something different is non-conforming
Thanks, I'll comment on the Cppreference page with a link to this
-- -- .:: Gennaro Prota ::. .:: https://about.me/gennaro.prota ::.
STD-DISCUSSION list run by email@example.com
Older Archives on Google Groups