Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:22:34 -0800
On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 09:29:59 PST Sopl'Wang via Std-Discussion
wrote:
> If we want protect C++ core value on template and generic programming, I
> suggest committee reconsider P1485R1 in c++20 or 23.
It's too late for C++20. For consideration in C++23, it needs to prove why an
*additional* syntax (not a replacement, since C++20 will be out) is beneficial
and will not unduly hurt teachability.
wrote:
> If we want protect C++ core value on template and generic programming, I
> suggest committee reconsider P1485R1 in c++20 or 23.
It's too late for C++20. For consideration in C++23, it needs to prove why an
*additional* syntax (not a replacement, since C++20 will be out) is beneficial
and will not unduly hurt teachability.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
Received on 2019-12-18 12:25:06