Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:18:16 +0200
On Tue, 10 Nov 2026 at 20:00, Peter Dimov via SG7 <sg7_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Does this objection also apply to const splicing? You can const_cast it away,
> but const_cast is already unsafe (would have been marked unsafe in Rust).
I don't think const splicing significantly changes the picture. The
standard library
has a requirement that const is physical const, but that doesn't
necessarily apply elsewhere.
> Does this objection also apply to const splicing? You can const_cast it away,
> but const_cast is already unsafe (would have been marked unsafe in Rust).
I don't think const splicing significantly changes the picture. The
standard library
has a requirement that const is physical const, but that doesn't
necessarily apply elsewhere.
Received on 2026-11-10 18:18:32
