Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:43:03 +0100
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 23:43 Andrew Tomazos <andrewtomazos_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this refers to the old new direction or some new new
> direction, but did you catch Andrew Suttons CppCon 2019 talks?
>
New new direction that was decided on the fly. But I don't yet understand
what it is supposed to be.
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:45 AM Corentin via SG7 <sg7_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>> Reading the minutes of the paper about consteval variables, it was not
>> clear to me what the new direction was supposed to me but it seemed
>> significant.
>>
>> Could someone be kind enough to speak about what that new direction would
>> offer that static reflection does not, what it would entail and what impact
>> that may have on time frames?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> Corentin
>> --
>> SG7 mailing list
>> SG7_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg7
>>
>
> I'm not sure if this refers to the old new direction or some new new
> direction, but did you catch Andrew Suttons CppCon 2019 talks?
>
New new direction that was decided on the fly. But I don't yet understand
what it is supposed to be.
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:45 AM Corentin via SG7 <sg7_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>> Reading the minutes of the paper about consteval variables, it was not
>> clear to me what the new direction was supposed to me but it seemed
>> significant.
>>
>> Could someone be kind enough to speak about what that new direction would
>> offer that static reflection does not, what it would entail and what impact
>> that may have on time frames?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> Corentin
>> --
>> SG7 mailing list
>> SG7_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg7
>>
>
Received on 2019-11-11 22:45:35