On 15/07/2022 16.19, Hubert Tong wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 3:36 AM Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer@gmx.net <mailto:Jens.Maurer@gmx.net>> wrote:
>
>     On 15/07/2022 02.20, Hubert Tong via SG5 wrote:
>     > In DTS 12907, 8.8 [stmt.tx] paragraph 6, bullet 6.7:
>     >
>     >   * dynamic initialization of a variable with thread storage duration.
>     >
>     > Is this intended to cover the case where the dynamic initialization for a non-local variable of thread storage duration is evaluated within the atomic block because the initialization was deferred ([basic.start.dynamic]) and can be deferred no further?
>
>     This is primarily concerned with local variables with thread storage duration,
>     where we have express synchronization effects.
>
>     However, it seems safer to exclude such dynamic initialization in general
>     (as the wording implies).
>
>
> Would you entertain a core issue to add a note to clarify that the wider scope is as intended?

This is the Transactional Memory TS, which is (possibly) done after the July
plenary, so a Core issue is lacking any defined ship vehicle.

Do we want to add that change to the NB comment resolution paper as an
add-on fix?

Jens