Let's split the difference, and do 1:15 EST = 10:15 PST = 7:15 CET tomorrow, Wednesday. That'll force two people to each miss 15 minutes.


On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Victor Luchangco <victor.luchangco.work@gmail.com> wrote:
This week, any time from 11:30am to 5pm ET works for me.

For a regular meeting, I can usually make most afternoons (ET), but Tuesday is generally not as good.

- Victor

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM Michael L. Scott <mlscott@acm.org> wrote:
I'm available 1:30-5 Eastern this week, but not 1-1:30.

On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:07 AM, Hans Boehm <boehm@acm.org> wrote:


I could do W 1:00-2:00 EST as well.

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:31 PM Michael Spear <mfs409@lehigh.edu> wrote:
Hi Hans,

Wednesdays I am not available from 2:00-3:30, so I'd only be able to attend the first half.

- Mike

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:29 PM Hans Boehm <boehm@acm.org> wrote:
Do Wednesdays 10:30 PST = 1:30 EST work for others, too? It would be nice to get one more meeting in before the WG21 meeting in Prague next week.

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott@acm.org> wrote:
Nothing works for me this Thurs.  Every second Thurs (inc. next Thurs) I'm available 9-1:45 Eastern.  Fridays are completely out.  Mondays after good except 11:45-12:15.  Tuesdays are good 9-11:15 or 12:15-1:45.  Wednesdays are good 9-2:45.

- Michael

On Feb 3, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Michael Spear <mfs409@lehigh.edu> wrote:

My only hard constraint this semester is 2:00-3:30 M/W.  Other than that, I can make just about anything work.

- Mike

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm@acm.org> wrote:
You should probably drop the meeting@ email address if you want to reply publicly. And I should probably not have cross-posted for this reason.

What's a better alternative? 10:30 generally works fairly well for me. Earlier is mostly bad for me because my Google meetings tend to want a Europe-friendly time. Much later than 10:30 makes it so Europe-unfriendly that we may cut into our participation.

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott@acm.org> wrote:
This was rejected by the listserve.  I forget which of my smtp options it insists on.

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Michael L. Scott via SG5" <sg5@lists.isocpp.org>
Date: February 3, 2020 at 8:33:03 PM EST
To: sg5@lists.isocpp.org
Cc: "Michael L. Scott" <mlscott@acm.org>, meeting@lists.isocpp.org
Subject: Re:  [SG5] SG5 in Prague
Reply-To: sg5@lists.isocpp.org

Sadly, this has become a bad meeting time for me.  I teach from 2:00-3:15 Eastern Time this semester.

- Michael

On Feb 3, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Hans Boehm via SG5 <sg5@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

SG5 will not meet in Prague, since most of the regulars will not be in attendance.

I do expect we will have our regularly scheduled teleconference at 10:30am PST on Thursday before the meeting, and I'm hoping for some SG1 discussion of P2066 which somewhat unexpectedly materialized in the mailing. (Thanks, Jens!)

--
SG5 mailing list
SG5@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5

--
SG5 mailing list
SG5@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5