As far as I know, the status here is unchanged. I have not heard anything
about ballot results. Let's cancel the meeting we had scheduled for
tomorrow as well.

Hans

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 5:34 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The DTS ballot is progressing. I don't think there's really anything to
> discuss until we have the results back.
>
> Hans
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Unless someone has an important agenda item, let's cancel tomorrow's
>> meeting.
>>
>> I've now been informed more officially that the NWIP ballot passed with
>> 100% approval.
>>
>> The DTS ballot is either about to be started, or has just been started.
>> So there isn't really much to discuss at this point.
>>
>> Hans
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 10:58 AM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> March 8 meeting attendees:
>>> Hans Boehm, Victor Luchangco, Jens Maurer, Michael {Scott, Spear, Wong}
>>>
>>> We had a brief informal discussion of the NWIP ballot and some
>>> preliminary feedback about both syntax and TM in upcoming hardware,
>>> concluding that these are basically known issues. ARM appears headed toward
>>> support of TME. and we're seeing both forward and backward steps in this
>>> area from Intel.
>>>
>>> Let's tentatively meet briefly on April 5, as scheduled. We should at
>>> least have official NWIP results by then. The usual coordinates:
>>>
>>> 8:00a.m PDT, 11:00 Eastern, 5:00 Central European
>>> (I believe that thankfully all three will be back in step and on
>>> daylight time by then.)
>>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd
>>> ‪(US) +1 208-925-0196‬ PIN: ‪255 542‬#
>>>
>>