If we are rescheduling, should we have an eye toward making it work for the
fall, too?

On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 9:57 PM Michael L. Scott via SG5 <
sg5_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I’m ok with canceling. We should also find a different time of the week
> for the next one, to get Victor back on the call.
>
> - Michael
>
> On Jun 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> It turns out I have a conflict between our June 24th meeting and a
> floating point workshop.
>
> AFAIK, there have not been any SG1 meetings, so our status is essentially
> unchanged. If someone has a reason to meet, we could reschedule to a
> different week, or try to carry on without me. Otherwise I suggest just
> skipping this one.
>
> Hans
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:51 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> I don't have anything for tomorrow's meeting except a really brief status
>> update. But we concluded last time that we should just go ahead and meet,
>> and abbreviate the meeting if there's nothing to discuss. On that basis,
>> let's meet as scheduled. The meeting will probably be brief.
>>
>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd, 10:15a.m. PDT
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Let's go ahead and try to meet briefly. The only agenda item I have is a
>>> quick update on WG21 process under Covid-19, to the extent I understand it.
>>> If Jens or Michael Wong is there, they can probably do a better job.
>>>
>>> If there's anything else to discuss, let me know.
>>>
>>> Coordinates, more or less as usual:
>>>
>>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd or +1 208-925-0196‬ PIN: ‪255 542‬#
>>>
>>> 10:15a.m. PDT
>>>
>>
> --
> SG5 mailing list
> SG5_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>