You should probably drop the meeting@ email address if you want to reply
publicly. And I should probably not have cross-posted for this reason.

What's a better alternative? 10:30 generally works fairly well for me.
Earlier is mostly bad for me because my Google meetings tend to want a
Europe-friendly time. Much later than 10:30 makes it so Europe-unfriendly
that we may cut into our participation.

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> This was rejected by the listserve. I forget which of my smtp options it
> insists on.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* "Michael L. Scott via SG5" <sg5_at_[hidden]>
> *Date:* February 3, 2020 at 8:33:03 PM EST
> *To:* sg5_at_[hidden]
> *Cc:* "Michael L. Scott" <mlscott_at_[hidden]>, meeting_at_[hidden]
> *Subject:* *Re: [SG5] SG5 in Prague*
> *Reply-To:* sg5_at_[hidden]
>
> Sadly, this has become a bad meeting time for me. I teach from
> 2:00-3:15 Eastern Time this semester.
>
> - Michael
>
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Hans Boehm via SG5 <sg5_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>
> SG5 will not meet in Prague, since most of the regulars will not be in
> attendance.
>
>
> I do expect we will have our regularly scheduled teleconference at 10:30am
> PST on Thursday before the meeting, and I'm hoping for some SG1 discussion
> of P2066 which somewhat unexpectedly materialized in the mailing. (Thanks,
> Jens!)
>
>
> --
>
> SG5 mailing list
>
> SG5_at_[hidden]
>
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>
>
> --
> SG5 mailing list
> SG5_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>
>