C++ Logo

SG5

Advanced search

Subject: Re: SG5 teleconference tomorrow
From: Victor Luchangco (victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-12-12 12:07:00


Hi folks,

Of course I left things to the last minute, but I did actually make a draft
of the wording changes. It just takes what was in the old TS and strips
out the irrelevant parts. I tried to update it to reflect changes in the
sectioning in the new C++ standard. However, it doesn't have language
describing what is legal within an atomic block. I don't currently have
anything specifying that calling constexpr functions is okay, for example.
I vaguely recall that people said there was some reason (not just the
sectioning changes) that I should look at the new C++ standard, but I can't
remember why now, so anything that ought to reflect such is not reflected
in this draft. Happily, it is only 4 pages. (About 18 pages of the
original TS was due to specifying library functions should be
transaction-safe, and we may need to include something similar in the new
spec, but I'm not sure.)

- Victor

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ro1hj--wM1uz9YwFY_Vv-otiBdIG6-OXSJETMgxzMAE/edit?usp=sharing

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:27 PM Hans Boehm via SG5 <sg5_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Let's go ahead and try for the scheduled meeting tomorrow, Dec. 12. I'm
> traveling, but 10:30a.m. PST = 7:30p.m CET still works for me. Same
> coordinates as usual.
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:19 AM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> As agreed at the last meeting. let's meet on schedule tomorrow, at
>> 10:30am PST, usual places:
>>
>> Join Hangouts Meet <https://meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd?hs=122>
>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd
>> Join by phone <+1-208-925-0196>
>> ‪+1 208-925-0196‬ PIN: ‪255 542‬#
>>
>> Agenda: Discuss SG1 reaction in Belfast
>>
> --
> SG5 mailing list
> SG5_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>



SG5 list run by sg5-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Older Archives on Google Groups