On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 9:10 AM Jens Maurer <jens.maurer@gmx.net> wrote:
Personally, I don't think spreading C++ library review bandwidth across more than one SC22 Working Group gets us the best outcome.

I agree. But I am envisioning something different. What I would like to see, is a separate working group staffed by different people. A different convener. Different set of experts. Perhaps from the companies who are direct stakeholders in "std/std2 as package manager."

They do their own thing. If they want std2::vector<tribool>? They get it. They want std2::movie_player? Sure!

It keeps it away from us. The libraries that we would reject, they can have, and it does not affect our bandwidth at all.

Instead, it gives LEWG a lever. They can say: "This looks like a good library proposal for WG{Other}." The result is fewer library proposals, and the ones we let in are of higher quality since they are filtered. I think this something people want.

Best