On 3/11/26 00:24, Hubert Tong via SG16 wrote:

> I also have qualms about allowing extraction fields in raw strings without the involvement of the d-char-sequence.
> In particular, I am against having the "outer raw string" end later than the first instance of )abcdef" in the following:
> fR"abcdef(
> {R"abcdef()abcdef"}
> )abcdef"
>
> I would be okay with
> fR"abcdef(
> abcdef{R"abcdef()abcdef"}abcdef
> )abcdef"
(typos fixed in above quotes)

I'm not seeing the difference between those two cases.
There is a first )abcdef" in the second lines of each example,
so (arguably) that's where the fR string-literal ends.