On 5/27/23 3:39 AM, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
For the minutes, an important note that is missing from the P2871R0 review is that just before we asked for consensus, I observed that this is the facility that lies in its name and uses UCS-2 rather than UTF-16.  I know that was important to persuading Jens!

Thank you, Alisdair! I remember you saying that; I'm not sure why I missed getting it into the notes. I added the following:

Alisdair reminded the group that codecvt_utf8 and codecvt_utf16 convert to and from UCS-2 or UTF-32 depending on the size of the first template parameter.

Tom.


AlisdairM

On May 26, 2023, at 3:35 AM, Tom Honermann <tom@honermann.net> wrote:

The summary for the SG16 meeting held May 24th, 2023 is now available.  For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.

No new decisions were made at this meeting, but we did reconfirm prior consensus for no objection to removal of the deprecated facilities as proposed in the following papers. See the polls associated with review of P2139R2 (Reviewing Deprecated Facilities of C++20 for C++23) during the 2020-07-22 SG16 meeting.

Tom.