Am Fr., 28. Apr. 2023 um 16:58 Uhr schrieb Corentin Jabot via SG16
> Following the meeting I tweaked the wording https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2741R2.pdf (and removed support for char8_t)
> I found talking about the second or third form unwieldy, so i added a "static-assert-message" grammar element which its own requirements.
I notice that the revised paper still refers to "cv char*". I had
criticized this approach in when reviewing P2741R1, see my reflector
Support for volatile char* in static_assert messages by P2741R1
("user-generated static_assert messages")
My understanding was on the feedback that the v-part of the
cv-qualifier should be removed from the proposal.