Thanks, fixed!

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:09 PM Peter Brett <pbrett@cadence.com> wrote:
Hi Jens and Corentin,

I think Jens is correct.  My understanding is that we were polling to use exactly the same phrasing as used for __STDC_VERSION__.

Best regards,

               Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: SG16 <sg16-bounces@lists.isocpp.org> On Behalf Of Jens Maurer via SG16
Sent: 26 January 2023 17:07

This is not what I remember.

I thought we specifically wanted the phrasing from __STDC_VERSION__, i.e.

"An integer literal of the form yyyymmL (for example, 199712L).
Whether this symbol is predefined and if so, what its value is,
are implementation-defined."