From a hasty review:

I could not figure the rule for using “code point” vs. “Unicode code point”.
The latter is a mouthful, especially when replacing a single word like “character”,
so if we could drop “Unicode” more frequently I think it would read better.

Multiple cases of 5-digit code points, u+000xx that should be 4-digit u+00xx.

Check for consistency of singular/plural. e.g., code point vs code points.

A bunch of typos on the motivation section, but most notably C+ rather than C++!

Other than being a mouthful when repeated so frequently, I think this looks like
a step in the right direction.

AlisdairM

On Dec 19, 2022, at 4:39 PM, Corentin via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

Hello folks.
Per popular request and as discussed last meeting, here is a paper that touches up the terminology we use in the core language. I only did [lex] so far. (only other sections that need fixing are basic and cpp). I'd love feedback before continuing.

The changes for "removing character" and "removing translation set" are of different colors.
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf 

Note that of course there is a dependency on https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2736R0.pdf and a fun 3 ways merge to operate editorially :)

Let me know what you think,

Corentin
--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16