On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 1:57 AM Corentin Jabot via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
\N{\N{}} ?

No, I really don't see the value in that, unicode character names are specified in a fixed set of characters, that is very unlikely to change 
(because these names are designed to be usable in a context where displaying/processing unicode is not possible)

So the current wide allowance is expected purely for lexing purposes? (That's fine I guess).
 


On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 8:50 PM Hubert Tong via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Does it make sense to anticipate that we may want \N{} escapes within n-char sequences someday and allow nested brace pairs today to reduce churn?


--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16