Oops, those SG16 chair notes were placeholder notes for myself to do research that I promptly forgot to do. Here is what I intended:

SG16 previously reviewed P2348R0 during its 2021-08-25 telecon, a draft of P2348R1 during its 2021-09-08 telecon, and a draft of P2348R2 during its 2021-09-22 telecon.

An additional mention of P2348 occurred during the 2022-05-25 telecon. Hubert had suggested that U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR) could be added to the basic character set in an updated revision of P2348. That suggestion does not appear to have been followed up on in a revision of P2348 or elsewhere ([lex.charset] table 1).

The most recent discussion I can find for CWG appears to have been for a draft of P2348R3 during its 2022-09-09 telecon.

Tom.

On 10/26/22 1:57 PM, Corentin Jabot via SG16 wrote:
Further notes:

SG-16 did review and agree with the wording.

CWG asked for the wording to be changed to replace all whitespaces in phase 1. 
Because I do not see how that would be compatible with my goal of having a clear grammar for whitespace and comments, I elected not to pursue that work further.

I do agree with the GB comment that the current state is undesirable but I do not know how to remediate that issue.

Thanks, 
Corentin


On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 5:57 PM Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Please review the following. If you agree with the proposed change and have no further information to add, then there is no need to respond. If you disagree with the proposed change, have corrections or new information to offer, or have comments on the candidate polls, then please reply by Monday, October 31st.

GB 5.2 [lex.phases] Clarification of wording on new-line and whitespace

GitHub nbballot issue #432.

Comment:

Clarification of wording on new-line and whitespace.

The specification of new-line and whitespace should be updated following changes to the C++ working paper, such as P2314 adopted in Oct 2021.

Proposed change:

We propose adopting a revision of P2348 ("Whitespaces Wording Revamp").

SG16 chair notes:

Did SG16 review P2348? I can't recall.

Link to CWG review of P2348.

Candidate polls:

  • [GB-XX]: SG16 recommends accepting the comment in the direction of the proposed change.
  • [GB-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment as not a defect.

Tom.

--
SG16 mailing list
SG16@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16